I think you are wishful thinking
Read the article - if it didn't work like this, the seller would be offering to enter into a contact with the entire world.
(
the RAND corporation a.k.a. Kevin Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 22:12,
Reply)
But there are different rules for sellers
and businesses.
EDIT: Also, the case cited in that is from 1960. That would mean that it would now be superseded by the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended by the Sale & Supply of Goods Act 1994 and the Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002). No?
I am not trying to get into a row though, I am not a lawyer, but it seems that would be the case to me?
(
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 22:13,
Reply)
you aren't a lawyer are you? ;)
(
the RAND corporation a.k.a. Kevin Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 22:19,
Reply)
Pfft!
Reading through the Trading Standards site, it does seem to explicitly differentiate between a "seller" and a "commercial business".
I did do Law at College, but I don;t remember too much of those years ;)
(
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 22:22,
Reply)
let's hope The Goat doesn't see this
and kill the mood by saying acts are not law or whatever it is he says!!
(
applehead herp derp, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 22:21,
Reply)
The Goat is a Twat!
MAKE THIS STATEMENT LAW! ;D
There is a difference between Acts and Laws, but acts such as the Sales of Good are part of common law also I believe.
(
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 22:22,
Reply)