It's my B3taday! Bugger Ive only got 2 hours left...curse you Australiaaaah!
(, Wed 5 Nov 2008, 22:24, Reply)
I mean, the Gorilaz done a similar thing a while back, but people actually saw them. And they actually looked like they were there.
Like this.
edit: unfortunately it includes that mong madonna.
(, Wed 5 Nov 2008, 22:33, Reply)
Like the pencil trick.
By god, she's got a good set of pins, though.
(, Wed 5 Nov 2008, 22:35, Reply)
she really hasnt.
Lets not start this again, I am off for a coffee and a bit of QI.
(, Wed 5 Nov 2008, 22:37, Reply)
can see the 'hologram' in the room. They can see her position on TV monitors. The presenter is looking 'through her', and is actually looking at a telly behind her virtual position.
She's actually stood in a 'booth' type area surrounded by cameras. The cameras in the studio do their thing, and the images are tweaked an matched by computer.
I personally think it's quite impressive, but overkill. I want my news programs to deliver facts, not flashy effects.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 9:42, Reply)
The fact that the thing how the message is conveyed is more important than the message itself. That and how biased they are.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 11:40, Reply)
bollocks to the tech
"35 cameras ringing me"
Nice :)
Happy b3taday too!!
(, Wed 5 Nov 2008, 23:34, Reply)
And you'll notice that half way through, they realise it's just not working, so they ADD degraded video effects so that it looks more star wars-esque.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 9:40, Reply)
yeah. "Technology so extreme we can barely get it to work!!!"
It's not a hologram, it's not necessary, it is ridiculous.
It's like someone standing in front of a bluescreened tropical island, saying "I've actually been transported to the bahamas!!!"
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 11:14, Reply)
"I've got a gun, let's take it to a broadway show!"
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 18:13, Reply)