We've all seen this, but linking just to point out that there appears to be no ruling about what the picture can actually be of....
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 22:11, Reply)
3 Royal Mail may refuse to reproduce submitted material if (or if Royal Mail believes that):
3.1 you do not or may not have the rights and/ or permissions referred to in paragraph 1;
3.2 it is or may be defamatory;
3.3 it depicts partial or full nudity;
3.4 it is offensive, obscene or indecent;
3.5 it promotes any particular religious beliefs or may offend against any person’s religious beliefs;
3.6 it may be offensive to any social, ethnic or other group;
3.7 it is political in nature or may be identified with a political cause or campaign;
3.8 it is intended for use in a commercial or business context;
3.9 it is not in keeping with Royal Mail’s brand integrity and/or may otherwise bring Royal Mail into disrepute;
3.10 it consists of or includes stamp imagery; or
3.11 it is in any other way inappropriate to appear on a Smilers® stamp.
4 Rejected orders will be refunded and the submitted material returned to you (except for defamatory, offensive, obscene or indecent materials which may be destroyed or forwarded to the Police).
5 You will pay Royal Mail for any costs or damages which Royal Mail incurs as a result of the reproduction of any material submitted by you which is defamatory or which breaches any other person’s copyright, privacy or other rights in any way.
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 22:33, Reply)
who successfully gets traces of goatse onto a stamp
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 22:56, Reply)
just after printing a million stamps. Rule 5 is the kicker huh?
(, Fri 28 Nov 2008, 10:00, Reply)
I reckon you would get away with just the hand with the ring on it, that wouldn't look dubious to anyone who doesn't know
(, Fri 28 Nov 2008, 12:10, Reply)