
BBC News 24 is arm chewingly bad in many ways. The presenters can't seem to get anything insightful from any 'real people' they talk to (for example eyewitnesses) and the professional commentators get free reign with their agendas most of the time.
I get the impression some of their presenters live in a dormitory outback of the studio and never leave the building.
I'm not saying Sky is the shining beacon of news coverage but given the choice I'll always rather watch Sky. In practice I flip around to balance the news anyway.
( , Wed 7 Jul 2010, 10:25, Reply)

I get Sky "news" inflicted on me via the TVs at the gym. It's wrenchingly bad - unless you're interested in the news alerts about a footballer or TV talent-show poppet doing something trivial.
( , Wed 7 Jul 2010, 10:31, Reply)

But the presenters on the BBC really make me despair. It's like a badly cooked English Breakfast, the BBC have better ingredients but they cook them really badly.
( , Wed 7 Jul 2010, 10:40, Reply)

which offers roughly 5% news and 95% 'celebs' whoring their wares with meaningless vox-pops on frankly pointless subjects. This morning they had some real filler material as their 'reporter' went to some dodgy estate and asked the general public if they would support the Germans in the World Cup. Fascinating stuff.
I find the only 'news' worth watching anymore is Newsnight. I long for the day when the UK gets its own Daily Show.
( , Wed 7 Jul 2010, 10:38, Reply)

I don't even include that as BBC News output. It's just a properly made programme that has news as it's topic.
( , Wed 7 Jul 2010, 10:42, Reply)