
In the one I am watching Brown says 'It has been suggested you were rolling toward the police, were you?'
As the answer contained neither a no or yes he asked him to clarify if it was a yes or no to which he was informed that he cant operate the chair himself.
I may only have a rudimentary grasp of the English language (only being a practitioner for 35 years or so) but to me that sounds like a journalist putting a question to someone to ask if rumours and speculation were true and trying to get a clear answer. There was no accusation of wheeling himself towards the police.
( , Tue 14 Dec 2010, 1:52, Reply)

Yes, I have to say that I dont see this as being spectacular journalism, but nor do I see it as egregious.
( , Tue 14 Dec 2010, 2:07, Reply)

2m40s "wheeling yourself towards police"
( , Tue 14 Dec 2010, 2:40, Reply)

is not the questions about moving towards the police, but the accusation that he was throwing missiles at the police. I think it's pretty clear from the interview that he is unlikely to be doing that. I don't really think that in his state, even if he were throwing things, that he'd have much success. It's just another idiotic question in an idiotic interview.
( , Tue 14 Dec 2010, 8:03, Reply)

I think the questions were perfectly reasonable and were seeking clarification.
I started watching this getting ready to call him a cunt but having watched the whole thing I don't see what there is to get excited about.
( , Tue 14 Dec 2010, 9:35, Reply)

Maybe seeking clarification but the style of the interview was definitely confrontary in nature and designed more to make out he was some sort of wheelchair activitist/anarchist strategically used to make the Police look like violent cunts rather than the fact the the Police were definitely overhanded in their methodology of dealing with this "precieved" threat.
( , Tue 14 Dec 2010, 9:45, Reply)