
More petulant twattishness here:
www.cveitch.org/
( , Mon 2 May 2011, 9:33, Reply)

When I watched the video of him being arrested he seemed like quite a sound bloke, but what the fuck is he talking about here?
Also, he said he intended to go to London to try and disrupt the wedding. No wonder he was arrested before the fact. Why did he choose to use the word disrupt? Bellend.
( , Mon 2 May 2011, 9:54, Reply)

because the Police will have been informed of this intention to disrupt the wedding and they acted upon it - if you only saw the first video of his arrest you would have thought "Oh my god Police State!" but in actual fact he publically broadcasted his intentions and of course The Police were going to react to prevent this. Anarchists/Activists with the intention to disrupt public events should really stay off the internet and mobile phones and plan these things in private.
( , Mon 2 May 2011, 10:19, Reply)

I don't want to make a call on his ego.
( , Mon 2 May 2011, 10:29, Reply)

great fella and justified anger. He's doing more than anyone to show where the glass walls in this country are
( , Mon 2 May 2011, 10:44, Reply)

just because you're not totally impressed with his way of expressing a relatively sane and inoffensive point of view. His heart's in the right place I think.....( after all, we've all be LOLing at the Lizard King jpegs etc. ) I thought the policing of the wedding protests especially was suspect to say the least. Plenty of other examples floating about and at least this guy has been committed to peaceful (and sarcastic) protest for years ( www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDh0Cvsw9Jk )
( , Mon 2 May 2011, 10:46, Reply)

to see the irony of complaining about the costs of policing and security of an event like that
( , Mon 2 May 2011, 10:48, Reply)

which doesn't end up with people causing millions of pounds of damage and destruction.
I think it might be wise that he learns to control his language, because you can see why he was arrested. He uses terms like hijack, disrupt, hack, all of which get the boabies in a prickly heat. I am pretty sure if he was more positive, that would make him more main-stream, and therefore make his arguments more likely to be heard...
I am pretty sure he jerks off to the fact he is followed, and gets arrested and stuff like that. But at least he didn't have a loudspeaker. I have wanted to punch anyone in the face with one of them at rallies, regardless of how 'on message' or how much I agreed with them.
( , Mon 2 May 2011, 12:11, Reply)

He goes to London, and shouts at pedestrians with it, calling them sheep and such. He really is an odious prick.
( , Mon 2 May 2011, 12:25, Reply)

I am trying to be balanced about the whole thing, because I think people have a right to be pricks. I don't think that should be criminal. That said, it sounds like he has committed a few crimes, regardless of how shit the laws may be.
On one hand, that is batshit, and I respect batshit. But you pick up a twatophone, and immediately you lose allll respect from me.
( , Mon 2 May 2011, 13:09, Reply)