
Drink a strong coffee before reading this. Some great comments though, e.g. "The scientific community is a living metaphor for a primordial black hole. Though it expends enormous amounts of energy, nothing comes out, not even one intellectually significant premise can escape."
( , Tue 10 May 2011, 8:40, Reply)

when people slag off science and scientists on the internet. Where do they think their electronic toys come from?
Maybe their computers run on homeopathy and french literature. Mine relies on quantum theory.
( , Tue 10 May 2011, 9:08, Reply)

and as any fule kno, the internet is a series of tubes, clearly made from rolled up pages of Maupassant novels.
( , Tue 10 May 2011, 9:20, Reply)

I was of the understanding that the internet ran on killer whales being shot down tunnels controlled by Ganesh.
10/10 for Molesworth reference, too.
( , Tue 10 May 2011, 9:58, Reply)

that'll be a day to remember
( , Tue 10 May 2011, 14:35, Reply)

Brian Cox Vs Duckworth Lewis:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kypzjdizamo
( , Tue 10 May 2011, 9:53, Reply)

if i could make that my sig, i would. wow, they typed that into a computer attached to the internet? shurely it is trolling.
( , Tue 10 May 2011, 10:09, Reply)

In an "explosion" the size of the big bang, a lot of matter would have been squeezed out, fallen back in, squeezed out again etc, creating a slower moving "soup", some of which would have coalesced in to "normal" matter, some in to black holes. Therefore some black holes must have been created at the start of the universe (if the big bang theory is to be followed). But this isn't news, either - people have long suspected black holes to form the centres of galaxies, as something pretty massive is required to produce the gravity required to hold a galaxy together. And there are a lot of galaxies.
But, if a black hole can "explode", or rather if its rate of "creation" or "ejection" of matter/energy is proportional to its mass and eventually become equal to the amount of energy/matter consumed, then why wouldn't a black hole reach "critical mass" before it had swallowed the whole universe?
This is just the "multiple mini bang" theory over again.
/serious perplexed rant
( , Tue 10 May 2011, 14:16, Reply)

I agree that black holes could have been created at the start of the universe, I think what the paper is arguing is that even if the universe is cycling through big bang/big crunch that some black holes from a previous cycle could somehow survive through a big bang and therefore be older than the rest of the universe.
( , Tue 10 May 2011, 14:31, Reply)