
That was good.
Should've ended with a 'wa-wa-waaaaaaaaaaaaa' for extra bonus points.
( , Mon 17 Oct 2011, 10:37, Reply)

In what sense is a shot being out of focus evidence that it's part of an ad? Isn't it more likely simply to be evidence that the camera hasn't had time to autofocus yet?
Were it an advert, you'd expect there to be more... y'know... advertising. Unless it's an advert for sousaphones, I see little evidence of that.
( , Mon 17 Oct 2011, 11:01, Reply)

I'm not hostile to the idea, but there's nothing that screams fakery to me...
( , Mon 17 Oct 2011, 11:30, Reply)

but it does (to me) scream viral, fake, acted etc...
( , Mon 17 Oct 2011, 13:51, Reply)

they bleep out his name, but show his face and where he worked, and - well, he's got a marching band. That's not really so anonymous, is it?
( , Mon 17 Oct 2011, 11:03, Reply)

if you watch it on youtube.com, it states his first name in the title.
( , Mon 17 Oct 2011, 16:11, Reply)

are they available to hire for when i quite my job, in about 45 minutes?
( , Mon 17 Oct 2011, 11:27, Reply)

( , Mon 17 Oct 2011, 15:29, Reply)

And the boss is wearing a blazer and jeans?
Like those before me, i am suspecting subliminal Pepsi advertistment, or negative advertising for the hotel itself.Because negative advertising gets many people to actually google the name of the hotel and find wonderful reviews (Yeah, i did that).
Moreover, the acting of the first employee that walked by before the boss was rather poor.
( , Tue 18 Oct 2011, 0:06, Reply)