(folks at home I mean)it's just a darned site more efficient way of 'loaning the tape' by putting it online, but they're saying there's an audience that don't care about the quality of what they're watching, most people do, and if they like what they see low qual they may also buy it in full qual, I know I do, everyone knows you can't trust the movie trailers for a measure of content, so in fact they may be losing revenue by closing such sites down.
Have they checked that? Has anyone asked that question and looked into it? I bet not!
What if they could start showing full length movies at a deliberately lower quality for that very purpose and see what that does for sales? Is it very much different to folks being lent a DVD off a mate then deciding you want to own it? Or seeing it on TV?
Or just dig up all their older content of the type you usually only see on lower grade cheap content TV channels and let him use that, stuff that isn't making any noticeable profit anymore, people could watch those when they wanted and discover a few old gems which could again motivate sales, people demanding an old film they've discovered to be re-released, and you could also use it as a conduit for your new trailers and such and take a share of the advertising profits, it's zero effort he's already got the basic structure working and it's been proven.
Or you could put the guy in jail, whichever's easier...
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:02, Reply)
looks like I was wrong, could you call off tabby?
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:11, Reply)
Feel free to flounce, Toryboy.
Though, I must admit to having a foot in your camp: creative people do deserve to get paid for their work & not be lambasted for not wanting it freeely distributed.
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:36, Reply)
Though I seem to have been jumped on round here for not crying about a little rich boy getting his fingers burned playing pirate for profit.
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:38, Reply)
Oh so very much this!
Hollywood's business model is now officially outdated. People no longer flock to cinemas lioke they did in my youth and twenties. Technology is available to home users that cinemas would have killed for just ten years ago. I have an HD projector and screen in my own house - I have no need to go to the cinema any more even if it wasn't overpriced and inconvenient.
Hollywood can get behind the 'viewing from home via the internet' model - and sack their (pirate chasing) lawyers and their (region locking and staggered release) marketing executives in one fell swoop, thereby saving billions - or die.
Stark choice but people like netflix seem to be doing OK - if only hollywood would get with it we'd all see films as and when we liked, for a reasonable price, in the comfort of our own homes.
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:23, Reply)
i live in the centre of london, super fast whizzy connection, and about 15 feet from the exchange (used to be fibre... but it was shit)
a buffering/or internet drop out mid film is unacceptable... we still need physical media or the ability to watch a completely downloaded film...
and what about my sister...loves films, lives rural...
the business model needs changing ill grant you... but remember not everyone has netflix/internet/hd projectors...
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:38, Reply)
a lot of internet somepeople dont have... and i fancy watching a film... in 2 days its not really the same as the cinema or buying a dvd from your nearest town (goodluck with that)
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:59, Reply)
I only use steam because I can make my own discs under their DRM.
Sadly with HMV, game, and gamestation going down the swanny the option to buy a disc is getting harder.
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 11:11, Reply)
...If a film/TV show is supported by product placement, can the producers use illegal download figures to ask for more cash from the product placers?
"Dear Toyota. You paid $x for our 1,000,000 person audience to see your car in the latest episode of "House". We can now confirm that a further 200,000 people illegally downloaded/streamed this episode. Please find attached an invoice for $0.2x..."
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 12:54, Reply)