I've been testing some of those
definitely a step in the right direction!
Quality is pretty darned poor for a fully paid up service tho, on most anyway, none seem to have quite got it right yet, but glad they're trying!
*edit* which I guess again proves my case a lil bit, if we aren't yet capable of putting films on online streaming commercially in a decent enough quality to be acceptable to the paying public, why are we suing the asses off those folks showing the dreadful quality stuff for free? If you can't yet provide a decent alternative that works, what sales are you protecting?
(
..wil, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:21,
Reply)
The quality should be ok as reports from netflex seem to be 1gb an hour.
thats 1080p quality levels.
of course you need to be able to handle that bandwidth on your side though.
I can get a 1.5gb UDK build downloaded in about 10 minutes but I have a good connection.
(
Cerebus Sticky! Sticky! Stick! Stick!, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:28,
Reply)
It's not that, the problem is one of compression
they seem to have pretty nasty problems of colour and shade, detail, it's not even as good as DVD quality on Lovefilm, like watchin an old VHS tape that's been stabilised in post, not great!
Netflix is better, my mate has it, but it still has problems, particularly with frame rate, not bad tho!
(
..wil, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:33,
Reply)
My neighbout really needs to get a faster connection.
It takes me about 20mins to download a film over her wifi, the bitch.
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:45, Reply)
must be all the bingo she is playing
(
fluffybunnykiller Is feasting on the clitoris of life, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 12:08,
Reply)