
I don't see why they should all have to physically go to London all the time, to be honest, it does seem a bit wasteful, especially if they all have to have second homes there as well. Maybe a couple of times a year or something for special occasions.
( , Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:35, Reply)

where they could put forward their constituents requests/vote in important debates etc without the Bullingdon club shouting.
Make them sit in their office in their "home town" and get some work done for a change instead of this ridiculous pomp and ceremony.
( , Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:39, Reply)

it would be nice if they could spend more time with their constituents, they have about 100,000 of them on average and then spend half the time swanning around in London.
( , Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:42, Reply)

and whilst a lot of it is either toadying or bluster the commons is supposed to be for debating the topics and you can't really do that with any eloquence online.
Same for M.Ps surgeries that they have to hold.
They could just take emails or letters but it's good that they have to come face to face with the public.
( , Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:42, Reply)

it was ok maybe in the middle ages when there were far fewer people, but now I feel like I need a sub-MP to represent me to my MP.
( , Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:50, Reply)

What with the crusades and the feudal system and everything.
( , Wed 11 Jul 2012, 14:08, Reply)

I'm just thinking theoretically in terms of the numbers though.
( , Wed 11 Jul 2012, 14:14, Reply)

where the PM puts the policy as a status and all the PMs have to "like" it?
No?
( , Wed 11 Jul 2012, 19:38, Reply)