
Seems like the story on London Vandal was wrong; but that doesn't necessarily mean that everything's hunky-dory.
( , Thu 19 Jul 2012, 8:27, Reply)

( , Thu 19 Jul 2012, 8:32, Reply)

*wipes egg from face*
( , Thu 19 Jul 2012, 8:44, Reply)

I bet the original story still get's past around long after this one is buried.
It's like those scare emails that get passed around the office now matter how many times you point people to snopes.
( , Thu 19 Jul 2012, 8:54, Reply)

*books tickets for the Kit Kat Club to ogle Sally Bowles*
Is this because I mentioned the Nazis yesterday?
( , Thu 19 Jul 2012, 10:38, Reply)

( , Thu 19 Jul 2012, 10:15, Reply)

I reserve an extra special loathing for people wo do that really stupid 'tagging', untermenschen!
( , Thu 19 Jul 2012, 10:18, Reply)

therefore the original can't be true...
Clever that the bail conditions mean they can't talk to each other. Does that include releasing copies of their bail documents to The London Vandal? This is very easily proved or disproved.
Or was it "bags on heads"?
My, it _is_ a tinfoil hat day today, isn't it :-/
( , Thu 19 Jul 2012, 13:34, Reply)