Silly. No one's actually benefitted from working in IT, since the 90's!
(riverghostservicing your mum since, Wed 29 Mar 2017, 19:13,
Share,
Reply)
I know...
(BrokenCoccyxdoesn't mind if you grope on, Wed 29 Mar 2017, 19:17,
Share,
Reply)
Can't we have a Y2k point 17?
(riverghostservicing your mum since, Wed 29 Mar 2017, 19:22,
Share,
Reply)
You don't work for Disney too, do you?
(BrokenCoccyxdoesn't mind if you grope on, Wed 29 Mar 2017, 19:23,
Share,
Reply)
You've seen my editing skills.
Highly unlikely. :P
(riverghostservicing your mum since, Wed 29 Mar 2017, 19:44,
Share,
Reply)
Glad you didn't say Y2K17...
as someone with a background in Electronic Engineering, it used to wind me up when it was popular to write the date like that in the early 2000s.
(Happosai_,,,,_(O ; o)_,,,, Wed 29 Mar 2017, 20:40,
Share,
Reply)
Shouldn't it be Y2k.017, if we're counting in thousands?
(Hemipygous, Wed 29 Mar 2017, 21:57,
Share,
Reply)
Because, it's a common shorthand in electronics to represent values of certain things by replacing the decimal point with the indicator of magnitudinal order...
So a resistor with a value of 4,700 ohms would usually be referred to as 4.7k ohms, or 4k7 for short.
So, by that means of representation, Y2k17 would mean the year 2170.
(Happosai_,,,,_(O ; o)_,,,, Wed 29 Mar 2017, 22:14,
Share,
Reply)