The Best / Worst thing I've ever eaten
Pinckas Ben Nochkan says: Tell us tales of student kitchen disasters and stories of dining decadence. B3ta Mods say: "Minge" does not a funny answer make
( , Thu 26 May 2011, 14:09)
Pinckas Ben Nochkan says: Tell us tales of student kitchen disasters and stories of dining decadence. B3ta Mods say: "Minge" does not a funny answer make
( , Thu 26 May 2011, 14:09)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Unless you're nearly three hundred years old and called Antoine Parmentier then I suspect you're talking arse.
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 13:56, 1 reply)
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 13:56, 1 reply)
You're wrong
I was there when he invented it. Someone might have contrived a similar combination before, but not to our knowledge.
My life has never been the same.
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 14:24, closed)
I was there when he invented it. Someone might have contrived a similar combination before, but not to our knowledge.
My life has never been the same.
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 14:24, closed)
What on earth are you two barking on about?
Cheese with chips has existed for literally centuries. I'm happy that you shared a man-moment in your student kitchen all those years ago ... and well done for adding something temporarily to a Wiki ... but you didn't invent anything new.
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 14:28, closed)
Cheese with chips has existed for literally centuries. I'm happy that you shared a man-moment in your student kitchen all those years ago ... and well done for adding something temporarily to a Wiki ... but you didn't invent anything new.
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 14:28, closed)
Hmmm
a) Tautology: if you invent it, it's new
b) Chips with cheese isn't necessarily the same as 'cheesy chips'
QED
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 14:36, closed)
a) Tautology: if you invent it, it's new
b) Chips with cheese isn't necessarily the same as 'cheesy chips'
QED
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 14:36, closed)
OK. I think I see the problem here.
You're educationally sub-normal.
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 14:38, closed)
You're educationally sub-normal.
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 14:38, closed)
Ah, clever.
Educationally sub-normal. What gives you that idea?
And what does it mean? Educated to a level below the norm? If so, then no.
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 15:54, closed)
Educationally sub-normal. What gives you that idea?
And what does it mean? Educated to a level below the norm? If so, then no.
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 15:54, closed)
It means you're too thick to hold up your end of this conversation.
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 16:06, closed)
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 16:06, closed)
Don't be so sure
At least I don't retrospectively edit my parts of the dialogue to give an impression that my interlocutor is a spazz-brain.
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 16:21, closed)
At least I don't retrospectively edit my parts of the dialogue to give an impression that my interlocutor is a spazz-brain.
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 16:21, closed)
Er, yes. I do.
a. Needless repetition of the same sense in different words; redundancy.
b. An instance of such repetition.
Quote: "You didn't invent anything new." the 'new' is redundant, or you could have said: "You didn't produce anything new."
So double Bless.
( , Tue 31 May 2011, 10:46, closed)
a. Needless repetition of the same sense in different words; redundancy.
b. An instance of such repetition.
Quote: "You didn't invent anything new." the 'new' is redundant, or you could have said: "You didn't produce anything new."
So double Bless.
( , Tue 31 May 2011, 10:46, closed)
Where's the proof?
I see none.
Oh wait, this is one of those terrible replies that is actually connected to the previous qotw.
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 14:44, closed)
I see none.
Oh wait, this is one of those terrible replies that is actually connected to the previous qotw.
( , Fri 27 May 2011, 14:44, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread