b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Bullshit and Bullshitters » Post 1047313 | Search
This is a question Bullshit and Bullshitters

We've had questions about lies and liars in the past, but this time we're asking about the sort of fantasist who constantly claims they've got a helicopter in the garden or was "second onto the balcony at the Iranian Embassy siege". Tell us about the cobblers you've been told, or the complete lies you've come out with.

Thanks to dozer for the suggestion

(, Thu 13 Jan 2011, 12:55)
Pages: Latest, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread


they also have a hard time arguing that it isn't... You can only say 'it's possible/conceivable etc'. A creationist can say the same, albeit we consider their ideas unlikely. And of course, we'd still like to know where the computers that created the simulation came from.
(, Tue 18 Jan 2011, 19:30, 2 replies)
Well, no
Once you accept that simulating an indistinguishable subset of the universe is a computable task and that a huge amount of accidental computation happens within the universe the numbers start to look convincing.
(, Tue 18 Jan 2011, 19:45, closed)

starts to look convincing...yes - which is my point.

dont get me wrong - i agree with what you and slva are saying in principle, but i'm adding that you cant overstate your case
(, Tue 18 Jan 2011, 19:58, closed)
This is my point.
Although the idea of a 'God' is constantly being nibbled away at by scientific discoveries, it still remains to be ultimately (dis)proved either way by its very nature.

I suspect the computer parts were bought from ebuyer, except for the graphics card, that was from Overclock.co.uk
(, Tue 18 Jan 2011, 19:52, closed)

yes, as someone famous one said, the great philosophical questions remain because they are unanswerable.
(, Tue 18 Jan 2011, 19:59, closed)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, ... 1