b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Annoying words and phrases » Post 694100 | Search
This is a question Annoying words and phrases

Marketing bollocks, buzzword bingo, or your mum saying "fudge" when she really wants to swear like a trooper. Let's ride the hockey stick curve of this top hat product, solutioneers.

Thanks to simbosan for the idea

(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:13)
Pages: Latest, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

No, I said that people who are voting for the party leader
are doing it wrong because they don't know how things actually work. I'm technically right because I *am* right. You're saying "yeah, but that's what people do, so you're wrong in reality".

Doesn't make sense.
(, Tue 13 Apr 2010, 15:12, 1 reply)
So...

Do people vote for a party? Or do they vote for the name of a person on a ballot paper?

You can't elect "Labour" to be your member of parliament. But you can elect the person who represents the Labour Party.

Using your semantics, nobody can vote for which party they want to run the country.

In this, I'm technically right (which is the basis of you argument) but wrong in the way people use their vote.

Cheers
(, Tue 13 Apr 2010, 15:20, closed)
Actually, further down
I've already admitted this was the case as point out by Happy Phantom. The difference is that you're voting for the representative of the party in your area based on the party manifesto. It's still the case that it's the party, not the public that vote for party leaders.

Whether or not this needs to reformed is not what I'm arguing, I'm arguing that this is the way it is, which it is. Anybody who thinks otherwise is wrong, which they are.

By voting, by no interpretation, are you voting for the party leader.
(, Tue 13 Apr 2010, 15:26, closed)
See My Answer Below

(, Tue 13 Apr 2010, 15:28, closed)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, ... 1