b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Corporate Idiocy » Post 1543886 | Search
This is a question Corporate Idiocy

Comedian Al Murray recounts a run-in with industrial-scale stupidity: "Car insurance company rang, without having sent me a renewal letter, asking for money. Made them answer security questions." In the same vein, tell us your stories about pointless paperwork and corporate quarter-wits

(, Thu 23 Feb 2012, 12:13)
Pages: Popular, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

« Go Back

Missing the "flaming" obvious
Dear COMPANY

As you are paid to inspect our property every week and report on any incidents that might effect the insurance, then perhaps the fact that the building burnt down 3 weeks ago might have been worth mentioning.

Regards
(, Tue 28 Feb 2012, 16:16, 9 replies)
or even "affect"

(, Tue 28 Feb 2012, 16:29, closed)
No, I reckon effect is ok here.
It would mean "that might bring the insurance into effect", as opposed to "that might influence the insurance".
(, Tue 28 Feb 2012, 17:15, closed)
Dodgy

(, Tue 28 Feb 2012, 17:18, closed)
I knew someone would point that out
But my grammar-nazism is just an affectation anyway
(, Tue 28 Feb 2012, 17:21, closed)
effectation

(, Wed 29 Feb 2012, 4:32, closed)
Thanks for the defence
but I am wrong.
Of course using the wrong grammar is infinitly worse than letting a million pound building be burnt to the ground.
(, Tue 28 Feb 2012, 17:28, closed)
Of course it is, my gramma was killed by grammar.

(, Tue 28 Feb 2012, 17:56, closed)
well i am always willing to proof read if needed
and correct where necesary
(, Tue 28 Feb 2012, 18:16, closed)
Heh, and as you know,
its one sea, to ess's.
(, Tue 28 Feb 2012, 18:24, closed)

« Go Back

Pages: Popular, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1