Creepy!
Smash Monkey asks: "what's the creepiest thing you've seen, heard or felt? What has sent shivers running up your spine and skidmarks running up your undercrackers? Tell us, we'll make it all better"
( , Thu 7 Apr 2011, 13:57)
Smash Monkey asks: "what's the creepiest thing you've seen, heard or felt? What has sent shivers running up your spine and skidmarks running up your undercrackers? Tell us, we'll make it all better"
( , Thu 7 Apr 2011, 13:57)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I'm confused.
So the first child was stillborn and then - I'm assuming - a couple of years later two others come along... and it's only then that the photo of the dead one gets sent out?
I could just about get my head around a photo of the dead one on the fist Christmas after - a sort of mourning-gone-weird-but-not-by-too-much affair... but to save longer? That's mighty strange.
( , Fri 8 Apr 2011, 15:28, 1 reply)
So the first child was stillborn and then - I'm assuming - a couple of years later two others come along... and it's only then that the photo of the dead one gets sent out?
I could just about get my head around a photo of the dead one on the fist Christmas after - a sort of mourning-gone-weird-but-not-by-too-much affair... but to save longer? That's mighty strange.
( , Fri 8 Apr 2011, 15:28, 1 reply)
Yes the first child was still born and then two healthy ones popped out in quick succession.
It was only last Christmas (2010) that we were presented with a photo frame containing three photos of both the living and dead kids. The still born child arrived around 4 years ago.
( , Fri 8 Apr 2011, 15:44, closed)
They probably feel that the first child is as much a part of the family as the others
so didn't want to miss him or her out.
Sending the photo out is a bit creepy, though.
( , Sat 9 Apr 2011, 8:36, closed)
so didn't want to miss him or her out.
Sending the photo out is a bit creepy, though.
( , Sat 9 Apr 2011, 8:36, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread