b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Eccentrics » Post 293047 | Search
This is a question Eccentrics

We all know someone who's a little bit strange - Mum's UFO abduction secret, or the mad Uncle who isn't allowed within 400 yards of Noel Edmonds.

Tell us about your family eccentrics, or just those you've met but don't think you're related to.

(Suggested by sugar_tits)

(, Thu 30 Oct 2008, 19:08)
Pages: Latest, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Ok, ok
Ease up there. Let it go now. It's been 20 years.

Your last sentance there is just wrong though. Wasn't the Amiga chipset supposed to go in the Atari originally? So the Amiga wouldn't have existed if the Atari management weren't such dickholes.

So, 360 or ps3?

/had an STE
//had a 130XE before that.
///Some things never change.
(, Sun 2 Nov 2008, 17:27, 1 reply)
Let it go? LET IT GO?? LET IT F**KIN GO??????
Surely if people are still under the dillusion than an antiquated system which had no multitasking capabilities what so ever was better than the Amiga chipset then we need to set this right otherwise our grandsons will grow up living a lie!!!!

(Im merely being eccentric here and takin the wee wee now ) :D
(, Sun 2 Nov 2008, 17:48, closed)
No multitasking?
Well, maybe not easily on the STe and Mega ST, but that was because they used the Motorola 68000, which couldn't keep other threads going if one crashed. Same as the Amiga, of course.

Then MultiTOS came along, which made a pretty fair stab at mulitasking, but was soon overtaken by the TT which had a 68030, fully capable of multitasking.

But then, Amigas were only ever used to play games with their rather crude graphics system. As the RM380Zs faded away from labs round the country and before the Amstrad PC640HDs arrived, you'd find lots of STs doing serious computing. No Amigas, though.
(, Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:04, closed)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, ... 1