b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » First World Problems » Post 1549568 | Search
This is a question First World Problems

Onemunki says: We live in a world of genuine tragedy, starvation and terror. So, after hearing stories of cruise line passengers complaining at the air conditioning breaking down, what stories of sheer single-minded self-pity get your goat?

(, Thu 1 Mar 2012, 12:00)
Pages: Latest, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

i'm not talking about
8 year olds, I'm talking about babies.

People seem much more tolerant of badly behaved kids than badly behaved babies, which to me makes no sense. A kicking 8 year old is a monumental pain, but you don't hear people saying they shouldn't be on a plane.
(, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 14:31, 2 replies)
You do if you are in conversation with me,
I think we've had crossed wires all along. As I said, Babies cry, I get it. Personally i'd ban them outright but I do at least realise that is neither practical or probably even legal, so I'll have to accept it. At least until I am Holy Supreme Ruler Of The Way Things Are Done. But if you have a child that should know better and doesn't and you don't do something about it, then you should have your passport taken away*.

*Again, probably neither practical or legal, but there you go.
(, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 14:35, closed)
Yep.

(, Tue 6 Mar 2012, 2:44, closed)
Taking a baby on a plane isn't such a brilliant idea.
In fact it's pretty cruel. The reason they scream is that their eustachian tubes are much narrower, making it much harder for them to equalise the pressure between the cabin and their middle ear so it's extremely painful for them. It's scary too 'cos you can't explain to them what's happening.
Taking babies to foreign countries isn't advisable either. Healthcare can be harder to access if they become unwell and they're much more vulnerable to gastroenteritis than adults, rapidly becoming dehydrated.
Overall I would suggest waiting 'til children are toddlers before flying them anywhere.
(, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 14:40, closed)
The ear argument is rubbish.
You just give them a bottle, and they're fine.

I'd be interested to hear how you're going to explain to my mother that she can't see her new grandchild for 2 years, because he might get the shits though.

Forget it, people travel, people have babies. Therefore, babies travel.
(, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 14:52, closed)
Put her on the phone and I'll tell her
"It has been decided that, as a fully grown human being, in control of all bodily functions and able to sit still for an extended period of time without screaming at the top of your lungs that, if you wish to see your Grandchild, you can get on the fucking plane instead".
(, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 14:54, closed)
I'm slowly losing
this argument.

Chip chip chip. Fuckers.
(, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 14:57, closed)
She probably wouldn't bother. It's a baby, I'm sure she's seen hundreds of them.
Unless it's got some spectacularly impressive birth defect she's not missing out on much.
(, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:11, closed)
Tempting to make
a thalidomide joke here, but I shan't.

Oh, wait . .
(, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:16, closed)
Oooooh
Right on topic, with a first world problem.
(, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 17:36, closed)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, ... 1