data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a question"
Overheard the other day: "I've told you before - stop swearing in front of the kids, for fuck's sake." Your tales of double standards please.
( , Thu 19 Feb 2009, 12:21)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
I couldn't agree more.
What it basically comes down to, is: does a person have an attribute which they were born with - or which otherwise came about due to no fault of their own?
Being partially-sighted is not a choice.
Having cerebray palsy is not a choice.
Being infertile is not a choice.
Being homosexual is not a choice.
Being heterosexual is not a choice.
Basically - if someone is a certain way, and they did not choose to be that way, then there is no reason to deliberately deny them the opportunities which are available to other people - if there is a reasonable way to circumvent their circumstances.
( , Sun 22 Feb 2009, 17:41, 1 reply)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
being made by all those suspiciously homophobic men.
( , Mon 23 Feb 2009, 13:52, closed)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
No, it really isn't. It's hard-coded into the DNA, because that's how the species procreates.
Now, I don't care which side your bread is buttered, but no amount of rug-munching or rootling round in the vegemite valley of love is going to end up with Mr Sperm bumping into Ms Egg in a dark fallopian tube, having a good time and settling down to some serious cellular mitosis in the Uterus suburbs.
Look, blowjobs are no good from a biological point of view, no matter how much fun they may be - sorry Mr Gay and Mrs Lesbian - you can't breed with your own gender. Only £Thousands of (generally) tax-payers' money pissed away on IVF or surrogacy will allow that and frankly, as a tax payer, I'd rather that money went on things that save lives, not a lifestyle accesory for the trendy same-sex couple down the road.
Sorry, but that's just my view - I don't hate teh gays, I just think that the cash is better spent elsewhere if it's on the NHS. Same goes for IVF as a whole, though.
( , Mon 23 Feb 2009, 15:15, closed)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
Bit of biology here. For a normally fertile rug muncher, you don't need IVF or any of that high tech stuff. Just a willing wanker and a turkey baster. Job done
Oh and teh gays of either biological persuasion can adopt if they can hack being patronised by social workers
( , Tue 24 Feb 2009, 0:31, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread