
Have you tried to be funny and failed horribly? Yeah, join the club. Or have you witnessed someone crash and burn by either being plain unfunny or offensively unfunny? Tell us your stories of sense of humour failure
Thanks to the charmingly named Reginald Donkeyfuck (not related to the Cheshire branch of the Donkeyfuck family, one presumes)
( , Thu 22 Aug 2013, 12:40)
« Go Back

Perhaps I should be about fourteen then it would be oh so different.
( , Thu 22 Aug 2013, 22:32, closed)

but not Have A Wank / Use My Arsehole... / Fucksticks, and that's proably what you've heard.
( , Fri 23 Aug 2013, 5:04, closed)

( , Fri 23 Aug 2013, 8:21, closed)

I bet you're in 6th form and wear corduroy trousers.
( , Fri 23 Aug 2013, 9:10, closed)

I liked the one about Fred West and the one about Michael Jackson, and I'm willing to cut him some slack, he knows he's crap and that's part of the joke.
Obviously he's not the greatest act of all time, but I'm bored to the teeth with 'everything is shit', so if I think something's alright I'm going to say so, and you're welcome to call me a cunt if that's what floats your boat.
Other things which are ok:
* The newsletter. Not what it was, but always just about entertaining enough to skim through.
* Wacky 2003-style zaniness. Not that it's actually funny, but if it helps people have fun and get along then fuck it, let them.
* Things that aren't funny. Most things are not going to be funny, and that's fine.
I'm as bored of the in-jokes on b3ta as anyone else, seriously, and have basically moved on to other bits of the internet, but I remember enjoying it all back in the day, am happy to leave it to some new people to do the same, just not sure why other people stick around when they aren't having any fun.
( , Fri 23 Aug 2013, 16:13, closed)

Green ones. I'm sure I looked like a massive bellend, but it was ok, everyone did.
( , Fri 23 Aug 2013, 16:46, closed)

www.b3ta.com/questions/goneoff/post2051074
( , Fri 23 Aug 2013, 17:02, closed)

There are obviously plenty of people out there who like Pink Floyd, some of them turned up and defended them, fair enough, but then the conversation stalled immediately as the counter-argument was "popular things can't be shit" which is self-evidently bollocks.
"Obvious target is shit" "Yes, I agree" "I don't agree" "then you're a cunt" "fuck off" "lolz annoyed" - this was mildly diverting to read the first time, but the appeal has worn off. "____ is shit" is a trump card, there's no way to argue against it except "oh no it isn't" or something equally stupid, like "popular things can't be shit." So what's the point of even starting it in the first place?
( , Sat 24 Aug 2013, 0:35, closed)

You're perfectly allowed to like Kunt and his Gang, but they are still, objectively, shit.
( , Sat 24 Aug 2013, 12:00, closed)
« Go Back