Lego Land is hugely disappointing

(LetsGetDownToIt, Fri 25 Oct 2013, 8:58, 11 replies)

Not for children, it isn't.

( monster munch person, man, woman... camera... TV?, Fri 25 Oct 2013, 9:19, closed)

For most nonces, a school is easier to get to.

( drimble he'd been white, he'd been black, Fri 25 Oct 2013, 9:25, closed)

Swipecards on the gates, though.

( monster munch person, man, woman... camera... TV?, Fri 25 Oct 2013, 9:31, closed)

Does she?
I'm sorry to hear that.
( drimble he'd been white, he'd been black, Fri 25 Oct 2013, 9:46, closed)

My kids enjoyed it aged between 3 and 5
After that, the lego bit was not interesting enough and the rides were too tame.

I would now spend the £72 entrance money on some new lego technic for them.
(LetsGetDownToIt, Fri 25 Oct 2013, 9:35, closed)

SKILL

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Fri 25 Oct 2013, 9:26, closed)

It could only be disappointing if you had high expectations of it.
And you'd have to be a dreadful cunt to have high expectations of it.
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Fri 25 Oct 2013, 12:32, closed)

Well, I had reasonable expectations - about £150 worth
but I have learned my lesson

so thank, yes I must be
(LetsGetDownToIt, Fri 25 Oct 2013, 15:30, closed)

Yo Mama Land is disappointingly huge.

( .Yeti., Fri 25 Oct 2013, 12:34, closed)

It was better when it was Windsor Safari Park.

(Set your faces to Stunned Bigly, Fri 25 Oct 2013, 14:22, closed)

It's no DIGGERLAND! that's for sure.

( stuj (^(^;;^)^) GO TEAM SPIDERS!(^(^;;^)^), Fri 25 Oct 2013, 15:18, closed)