MTFU
When have you had to be brave when all you've wanted to do was weep like a blubber-titted bitch?
Tell us so we can judge you.
via Smash Monkey
( , Thu 1 Aug 2013, 17:36)
When have you had to be brave when all you've wanted to do was weep like a blubber-titted bitch?
Tell us so we can judge you.
via Smash Monkey
( , Thu 1 Aug 2013, 17:36)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Hang on a second
Your telling me that the "forensic people" turn up and undertake an intrusive internal examination on a rape victim, just in her house, not in any kind of medical facility?
And while the "victim" is being "examined" the suspect is just left standing around on the balcony waiting for the "results" of the "examination" to come through, despite these likely taking at least several days in a lab to actually come back?
Are you really saying all that and still expecting us to believe you?
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:27, 4 replies)
Your telling me that the "forensic people" turn up and undertake an intrusive internal examination on a rape victim, just in her house, not in any kind of medical facility?
And while the "victim" is being "examined" the suspect is just left standing around on the balcony waiting for the "results" of the "examination" to come through, despite these likely taking at least several days in a lab to actually come back?
Are you really saying all that and still expecting us to believe you?
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:27, 4 replies)
I'm furiously reconsidering and I can't see anything wrong with it.
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:31, closed)
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:31, closed)
Well, there's the fact that evidence collection is a prerequisite for analysis, and there was no mention of the latter taking place at the scene. And then there's the bit where you don't seem to be able to tell the difference between "your" and "you're".
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:47, closed)
Rather than argue,
just pop your goggles on and enjoy the shit-flinging show.
It's actually been moderately funny how much of a froth most of them have worked themselves into with such limited stimuli.
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:51, closed)
just pop your goggles on and enjoy the shit-flinging show.
It's actually been moderately funny how much of a froth most of them have worked themselves into with such limited stimuli.
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:51, closed)
I'm not frothing, I'm asking genuine questions about this "true story" which casts serious doubt on it authenticity
You do realise that just because someone disagrees with you it doesn't mean they are upset or furious or any of those things. I just can't see why you have spent so long writing this story and yet made so many basic errors.
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:53, closed)
You do realise that just because someone disagrees with you it doesn't mean they are upset or furious or any of those things. I just can't see why you have spent so long writing this story and yet made so many basic errors.
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:53, closed)
One spelling error and i'm illiterate
That's quite amazing. And yet you understood exactly what I meant. Still, you have stopped attempting to answer the questions I posed and instead started making ad hominem attacks.
This casts you in an excellent light.
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 13:01, closed)
That's quite amazing. And yet you understood exactly what I meant. Still, you have stopped attempting to answer the questions I posed and instead started making ad hominem attacks.
This casts you in an excellent light.
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 13:01, closed)
He didn't say you were illiterate
So shouldn't that also put your reading skills into question too?
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 13:07, closed)
So shouldn't that also put your reading skills into question too?
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 13:07, closed)
I do so love it when pricks moan about "ad hominem", like we're peer reviewing a paper in Nature or something, rather than bickering on the internet.
Tell me, are you unfamiliar with the site?
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 13:10, closed)
OH NOES MY SPELLING WAS INCORRECT!!!!!!
And let me write it once more to be very clear. If you are conducting an examination of a rape victim, it is not going to be done at their house with the suspect on the balcony. It will be done in a hospital. Which bit of that don't you get?
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:52, closed)
And let me write it once more to be very clear. If you are conducting an examination of a rape victim, it is not going to be done at their house with the suspect on the balcony. It will be done in a hospital. Which bit of that don't you get?
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:52, closed)
It's not that the spelling was incorrect - you actually spelled the word quite well, it was just the wrong word.
You realise that the forensic people might be there to examine the scene of the crime, rather than the person, right? I mean, they turned up to do that when some cunt broke into my car, so I reckon they might also do it for a rape.
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:55, closed)
I was actually really impressed by how many
fingerprints they got of our sliding doors a few years ago after our last break-in. Latex gloves are your friend.
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 13:11, closed)
fingerprints they got of our sliding doors a few years ago after our last break-in. Latex gloves are your friend.
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 13:11, closed)
I'm pretty sure there was a similar storyline in The Flying Doctors once
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:36, closed)
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:36, closed)
Last week his mates all got charged with possession with intent to supply - without being arrested.
The police are seriously weird in Erinsborough, it seems.
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:40, closed)
The police are seriously weird in Erinsborough, it seems.
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:40, closed)
It's worse than living in Hollyoaks for outrageous breaches of legal protocol.
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:41, closed)
( , Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:41, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread