Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Loads of people watch the X-factor and Jeremy cunting Kyle.
Loads of people believe Cheryl Cole's marital status is a matter of national importance.
Loads of people believe that the next fad diet will be the one to shift their excessive weight, despite the previous twelve not having worked.
Basically,. 'loads of people' do loads-upon-myriad-loads of tremendously fucktarded things. Should I bow to the masses?
(, Tue 14 Dec 2010, 12:06, 1 reply, 15 years ago)
Things like 'simples' etc are just fads and won't hang around forever.
(, Tue 14 Dec 2010, 12:13, Reply)
It's probably safer not to underestimate the insidious power of branding and advertising and batter that meerkat and its creators to death whilst we have the chance.
As for the language issue: there has to be a point at which you say "no more." Granted, our language in its present state, its various idioms and even its spellings, have shifted quite considerably over the last couple of hundred years.
However, when these changes are down to people being incapable of spelling a word, or even using it correctly, there is naturally going to be a resistance to this change. If we let every little variation become "standard," and just lay back to accept it, as your badly-punctuated reply suggests, the meanings and spellings of words could very quickly be corrupted to different extents in different regions of the country until we no longer had a standard, accepted language.
It is a triumph of a society and its culture that, whatever regional variations you might apply to your own speech, if you have at least learnt the accepted form of the language, you can communicate with anybody who has learnt the same. This is why we resist these changes: because although language does indeed evolve, each change must be carefully evaluated for the threat it poses to this achievement in communication.
(, Tue 14 Dec 2010, 12:23, Reply)
(, Tue 14 Dec 2010, 13:36, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread