b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1057234 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

BEING SARCASTIC AT PEOPLE ON THE INTERNET IS EXACTLY HOW HITLER GOT STARTED
Joking aside, I'm with Humpty on this one. There are various people on QOTW who I'd happily kneecap if I ever I met them
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:18, 1 reply, 14 years ago)
Yeah but no offense you're a fucking spastic.

(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:28, Reply)
INTERNET HARDMANNING
Darth is clearly an 8th Dan ninja stood tall at 8foot 2
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:32, Reply)
5'11" sadly
The rest is true though
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:34, Reply)
Why the fuck do you get so upset with online twatting about?
It's not an online ballroom board.
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:36, Reply)
Pet hate
Personal choice. Call it what you will. I just don't get the appeal of online abuse. Feel free to enlighten me.

I am intrigued by the idea of an online Ballroom forum. I imagine it would be inhabited by insufferably pretentious people. Let's find out.
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:38, Reply)
I can't be arsed going into it, but see Badger above
Without the abuse this place would simply be monotony, shit people beaking about their shit hood butter lives, with food and weekends thrown in for good measure.
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:45, Reply)
AKA Home Sweet Home threads.

(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:48, Reply)
Their spirit lives on in the evening shift :((
I can't be the only person to have noticed
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:50, Reply)
Then stay on /talk in the evenings.
Simple!
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:53, Reply)
BGB is running me off the board!!!1!1!1!!!1

(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 11:01, Reply)


(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 11:06, Reply)
The only thing that pissed me off about the HSH threads is that the people in them were fine abou it.
Then some people came along and said this is shit and moaned and moaned about it. If it was shit then why join the thread?
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:51, Reply)
That's how the Nazi's got into power.

(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:52, Reply)
Not a bad point really
also points for the Hood-Butter reference
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:48, Reply)
Abuse is rarely funny.
Taking the piss is.
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:49, Reply)
Mostly, though
the distinction between abuse and taking the piss depends on the recipient's sense of humour. This is an online site universally known for very borderline stuff. I'd argue 90% of the time if you're getting offended it's your sensitivity rather than the commenter's nastiness that is the problem. The other 10% is where the problem lies, but BranynDedd's trolling isn't anywhere near that.

Some of the abuse that was trolled at, say, Tourette's, in the past, is in the unacceptable 10% category and I happily said so, on talk, at the time. But there is an issue here - I'm not justifying cunty behaviour, but if you post on a public forum deeply personal information which would hurt you if used abusively, then while you don't deserve abuse you can hardly be surprised about it.

I think that it's a bit double-standard really. What Humpty is saying is a version of "you'd never say that kind of stuff to someone in a pub but it's somehow OK on the internet?" ... but the response is "you'd never stand up in a pub an announce you were abused as a child to strangers" either. You can't really have your own way on one and not the other.
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:58, Reply)
You have a point.
But I do think that abuse is very different to piss taking and nothing to do with the recipient's sense of humour. It's to do with the abusers intention. Whether to poke fun, (even if close to the bone), or to make someone upset.
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 11:04, Reply)
That, I concede, is true - although again that's just as much down to the recipient's interpretation
But that's part of the online world, and on a public site that will never go away. A lot less of the stuff on here is genuinely meant to upset than people think. At most all a troll is looking for is a rise, so why give them it?
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 11:19, Reply)
I agree.
Which is something I've learnt not to do. Rory has tried a couple of times to get a rise out of me and I think he's cottoning on now.
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 11:20, Reply)
(!)

(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 11:29, Reply)
Your congenital incapability to go more than 5 minutes without being a dick never ceases to amaze me
No offence.
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:35, Reply)
You're an easy target I can't resist it.
It's pretty much how you feel when a guy bends over in front of you.
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:38, Reply)
Brilliant
Explain your motivation for calling me a fucking spastic in this context, if you would
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:39, Reply)
Because you were saying you care enough about what happens on here
to "happily kneecap" people you don't really know in real life.
That's ridiculous. There is absolutly no reason to wish anyone on b3ta harm for what they do on b3ta, just think through that chain of events. The way you seem to think that your position is somehow morally justified is also hilarious, YEAH STRING UP THE BULLIES. That's just wrong.

But about 60% of why I called you a fucking spastic is because I knew you would act like a fucking spastic as soon as I called you a fucking spastic, you fucking spastic.
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:45, Reply)
I accepted some time ago that you and I are never going to get on
but surely someone as intelligent as you can see the inherent flaw in chastising me for taking B3ta too seriously and then assuming that when I say I'd "happily kneecap" someone I absolutely mean it. Do I strike you as someone who goes round starting fights? Look at my hair, for fuck's sakes.
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:51, Reply)
The whole point was I was taking a post differently to how you meant it.
That's how half these arguments start, and it's inherent to nearly everything text based, especially something as quickly writen as this. That's why you shouldn't ever take anything seriously on here.
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:54, Reply)
This is why we're never going to get on
You make an absolutely brilliant point here in response to a question which I posed which I now consider to have been satisfactorily answered. But you had to call me a fucking spastic several times first, presumably to fill some sort of quota
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 10:58, Reply)
It was only 5 times stop being so sensitive.

(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 11:04, Reply)
What's your cut-off for "several" then?
Your abject lack of any sense of grace is most unbecoming
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 11:18, Reply)
It's part of my charm
.
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 11:21, Reply)
Never heard it called that before
but then I can't imagine many people have used the word "charm" with reference to you, so I assume you think said word means something else.
(, Thu 27 Jan 2011, 11:25, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1