b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1084017 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Chariots of Fire
is better than Raiders of the Lost Ark
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:26, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
further proof that women are irrational

(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:27, Reply)
not really
I just don't really happen to enjoy Raiders of the Lost Ark.

To modify my original statement. Chariots of Fire deserved the Oscar more than Raiders of the Lost Ark. Doesn't mean Raiders wasn't a good film.
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:28, Reply)
that doesn't mean that Chariots of Fire is better
it just means you have defective taste in film
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:30, Reply)
I have excellent taste in film

(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:32, Reply)
the evidence suggests otherwise

(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:33, Reply)
I'm with Vippers on this one
As is the rest of the right-thinking world
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:35, Reply)
nonsense
I have amazing taste. I just don't value flashiness over story*

*with the obvious and laudable exception of Fast and Furious.
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:35, Reply)
now that's just crazy talk
are you seriously suggesting that Raiders of the Lost Ark doesn't have a good story?
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:36, Reply)
I think the winding up element
might be being missed here ;)

But as it happens I haven't seen Raiders of the Lost Ark since I was a child.
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:37, Reply)
you should watch it
I might raise Darth's ire here, as I'm going to say it's not as good as Last Crusade, but it's still great
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:38, Reply)
I saw the Last Crusade
and that was good. And whatever the other one's title was. I didn't bother with the Crystal Skull one though
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:39, Reply)
Crystal Skull should be stricken from the record
Raiders is better than Temple of Doom, definitely.
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:41, Reply)
I personally prefer Raiders, despite lack of Connery
However, both films are so staggeringly good as to make quibbling over which is better moot
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:43, Reply)
trudat

(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:47, Reply)
M'lud can I submit
the following evidence for male irrationality as opposed to female? The giant overwhelming mancrush the entirety of the masculine part of race has on Sean Connery.
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:48, Reply)
Easily explained
He was irrefutably cool as Bond, he has a sexy voice, he never seems remotely flustered by anything and hasn't let a complete inability to sound anything other than Scottish stop him becoming a huge Hollywood star
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:51, Reply)
That's not an explanation
I think my point stands. He's a shit actor*, he's not the best Bond, he's massively boring, a bit of a wife-beater and his politics are shit and hypocritical.

*With the obvious exception of Highlander


Edit: Shit I'm turning into Monty aren't I? :(
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:55, Reply)
Agree with all of that ^^^

(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 16:05, Reply)
Fine...
He's very good-looking. I think this helps.

Bring it on...
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 16:08, Reply)
He really really isn't
especially now, but not even in his prime
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 16:09, Reply)
That is quite possibly the most ludicrous statement in the history of the universe
No it patently isn't
(, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:28, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1