I personally prefer Raiders, despite lack of Connery
However, both films are so staggeringly good as to make quibbling over which is better moot
(Darth Foxtrot A one-man army dedicated to making fetch happen, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:43, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

trudat

( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:47, Reply)

M'lud can I submit
the following evidence for male irrationality as opposed to female? The giant overwhelming mancrush the entirety of the masculine part of race has on Sean Connery.
( Amberl was stripey and dominated Europe, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:48, Reply)

Easily explained
He was irrefutably cool as Bond, he has a sexy voice, he never seems remotely flustered by anything and hasn't let a complete inability to sound anything other than Scottish stop him becoming a huge Hollywood star
(Darth Foxtrot A one-man army dedicated to making fetch happen, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:51, Reply)

That's not an explanation
I think my point stands. He's a shit actor*, he's not the best Bond, he's massively boring, a bit of a wife-beater and his politics are shit and hypocritical.

*With the obvious exception of Highlander


Edit: Shit I'm turning into Monty aren't I? :(
( Amberl was stripey and dominated Europe, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 15:55, Reply)

Agree with all of that ^^^

(Reverend Fister "a disciplined fuckwit", Wed 16 Feb 2011, 16:05, Reply)

Fine...
He's very good-looking. I think this helps.

Bring it on...
(Darth Foxtrot A one-man army dedicated to making fetch happen, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 16:08, Reply)

He really really isn't
especially now, but not even in his prime
( Amberl was stripey and dominated Europe, Wed 16 Feb 2011, 16:09, Reply)