He would have done, if he had the guts, instead he used is pawn to do it.
He promoted it to make sure the message reached that side of the world, where that would be the inevitable circamstance.

He is just as responsible as the curupted imrams who teach a bastardised version of Islam to the masses from childhood.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Fri 1 Apr 2011, 17:23, 1 reply, 15 years ago)

He really isn't
it was a stupid and hateful thing to do. But he's not responsible for those deaths, the people who killed them are
( Amberl was stripey and dominated Europe, Fri 1 Apr 2011, 17:26, Reply)

It's a bit like saying a general has no responciblity for their troop's actions.

( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Fri 1 Apr 2011, 17:28, Reply)

I'm not saying the murders are innocent at all, they're, well, they're murders, I hope they burn in hell....
.... but they don't have the benfit of a non-religious education.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Fri 1 Apr 2011, 17:30, Reply)