Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I don't think most people do, but the papers seem to think that if they don't write this stuff people won't buy their papers.
So yeah they have a right to privacy, but then everyone should have a right to privacy it shouldn't just be the people who can afford the most expensive lawyers.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 10:44, 1 reply, 15 years ago)
You can take the combined IQ of these people and still struggle to make three figures. You may know them as "the general public".
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 10:46, Reply)
that if they got rid of one type of reporting from their newspaper of choice what would it be. Then celebrity reporting would be at the top of their list.
Magazines, not so much but people who read celeb magazines are beyond help.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 10:48, Reply)
Purely to set fire to them in my garden, and then dance around them laughing manically.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 10:50, Reply)
I haven't just done it for shits and giggles.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 10:53, Reply)
it was pretty funny online.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 10:54, Reply)
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 11:02, Reply)
Ha ha.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 11:24, Reply)
EDIT - sorry, force of habit.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 11:28, Reply)
But you do make an important distinction. And are quite correct. A cull is the only option left.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 10:50, Reply)
Somehow all this celebrity gossip pish actually sells newspapers, magazines etc. I have no idea why. Who actually gives a shit about Katie Price's latest relationship disaster? Well the truth would appear to be that lots of people do. People with single-digit IQs with fuck all going on in their own lives.
Unfortunately this particular demographic seems to make up around 75% of the population. Hence the popularity of X-Factor.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 10:50, Reply)
I think it's a lie that the media have started to believe themselves.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 10:52, Reply)
We just have to make a genuine interest in celebrity gossip punishable by death. Might be difficult to implement but it makes perfect sense.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 10:54, Reply)
They don't buy themselves you know. Our shop at work stocks all the main newspapers, but then loads of Heat, OK, Now! - that sort of pish. Presumably they stock them because people actually buy them.
It's no coincidence that our building is mainly filled with vacant fuckwits.
They also stock The Rangers News, which totally proves my point.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 10:58, Reply)
and increase in sales is false. They could just put pictures of attractive women in their underwear and it'll increase sales, they don't have to describe "sex acts" with footballers.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 11:00, Reply)
So are you suggesting that 'celeb' magazines are predominantly bought by hetero men and lesbian women? I think that's 'grot' mags that you're thinking of.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 11:04, Reply)
and The Star and the Express,
as I mentioned above I think the celeb magazines are different to the Tabloid press. The celeb mags almost have a pact with some celebs which I don't think is that bad, it's the confrontational attitude of the press that is what's wrong.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 11:06, Reply)
Even the fucking judges don't have talent. Hasselhoff's nothing without a talking car or a legion of blonde women in red swimsuits.
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 10:53, Reply)
But nonetheless, if he's not prepared to replicate it on ITV for our entertainment, it gets filed alongside KITT and Pamela Anderson's breasts in his useless back catalogue
(, Mon 9 May 2011, 11:23, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread