So you fucking a twelve year old is ok?
You've said so, I wonder what's on your harddrive freefair eh
( Light In Chains maker of the ikea sofa, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:35, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

No, if you look what i said, I said you can't go to 12 or below.

(888777555, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:36, Reply)

I feel sorry for anyone that you statutorily rape having to listen to your Shakespeare defence in court

( Light In Chains maker of the ikea sofa, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:43, Reply)

I don't think there has even been a case since the 20th century of anyone of 16 ever being prosecuted for having consenting hetrosexual sex with someone above the age of 14 or 15.

(888777555, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:45, Reply)

That's OK then.
Why no try it on the steps of the local nick?
( Bartleby A dead man on vacation, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:47, Reply)

So if you fucked a fourteen year old tard who 'consented' to sex with you it'd be ok in the eyes of the law?

( Light In Chains maker of the ikea sofa, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:48, Reply)

I've gone for a tard here in my example as I've just seen your picture and they do say birds of a feather flock together

( Light In Chains maker of the ikea sofa, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:49, Reply)

Well the general rule is you shouldn't be over 18.

(888777555, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:50, Reply)

I'm just gutted that he's like 16 and already beaten the amount of people he's shagged.
Esspesh if you include his uncle that bought him a car for his birthday.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:57, Reply)

Really, you've got access to the transcripts of every court in the land now, have you?

( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:49, Reply)

Well since about 40% of people lose their Virginity before 16 i'd say society considers it normal enough not to prosecute.
I assure you 40% of people have not been raped.
I assure you there 40% of the population do not have criminal records for sex offences.
(888777555, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:53, Reply)

Rather crucially
even if that spurious stat was true, it's not usually to someone over 16.

I've not one shred of an idea as to what you think your statistics are supposed to prove, here. You made a massively sweeping statement which you don't have an iota of a hope of backing up (no 16 year old has be prosecuted for consenting sex with a minor in the 20th century), and I called you on it. Your solution is to spout more meaningless and completely disconnected statistics to distract attention?

Really, you must try harder.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:58, Reply)

Ok, no i don't have every court record.
But I've never heard of it, and neither has anyone else I know.
My (academically outstanding, before you claim "sink estate!") school ranges from 13 to 18 years old and large sections of every year are making sexytime, sometimes across years, but there isn't a police force in the land that would take us to court.
Laws are ethereal constructs that happen to have been written down on paper and that only have significance if applied.
(888777555, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 18:09, Reply)

why on earth would I give a shit about the quality of your school?
And laws, generally, are put in place to protect the vulnerable. They aren't "ethereal constructs". In this case, it is because generally, but not always, those under the age of 16 do not have the mental maturity to make a decision to engage in sexual activity. Some of you, I'm sure, are mature enough to make the decision but some aren't and are therefore vulnerable to exploitation. You set the bar to protect the most vulnerable, not to pander to the least vulnerable. Can you honestly not see that? because if you can't, frankly, you're certainly not mature enough to play kisschase, let alone have sex.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 18:26, Reply)

You fucking noncing arsehole, plenty of people under the age of 19 have ended up on the sex offenders register
Fortunately you're too clumsy to abduct any child to rape them, however the underage noncery that fills your hard drive makes me somewhat sad that you encourage these crimes to be perpetrated. Still that's not illegal according to freefair as all law is but an Ethereal construct, you fucking noncing prick
( Light In Chains maker of the ikea sofa, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 18:28, Reply)

you can't go under 16. Regardless of your age.
The crimes are merely different. If you are 16, you fuck someone under 16, that's still unlawful sex with a minor. There are variations from 13-16 to do with which country in the UK you live in and whether it becomes statuatory rape, but it's all illegal. You nonce.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:48, Reply)

Well It's a law that society does not respect with regards to people between the ages of 14 and 18.
Its a law that deserves to be broken and though I've ruled out breaking it myself just to be safe.
(888777555, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:56, Reply)

no law "deserves to be broken"
you fucking idiot.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:59, Reply)

Your nose deserves to be broken. YOU PAEDO SCUM.

( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 18:07, Reply)

Half your age plus 7

( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:37, Reply)

Assuming he is 16
that means 13.
( b3th Not shit. Not mod., Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:42, Reply)

15.

( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:44, Reply)

that too.
/shit at maths blog.
( b3th Not shit. Not mod., Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:46, Reply)

Gonz, it's a piece of flippant advice for adults
it's not a legal definition or an accepatable defence in court
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:44, Reply)

plus it brings up negative paradoxes for anyone under the age of 7.
Did you like my use of the phrase 'negative paradoxes' ? I have no idea what to call it, but that seems alright. Basicly, if they're, say, 4, the youngest they could go to is 9, which is nearly double their age. Reverseing that, the oldest they can go to is 1, which is 1/4 of their age. Eiather way, I like calling it that.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Mon 11 Jul 2011, 17:55, Reply)