Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Surely you must realise that for all its faults, FPTP delivers accountable representation. Which is the point of a representative democracy.
You're 16 right? Can we not discuss DnB, or video games or skateboarding or something?
(, Tue 13 Sep 2011, 21:23, 1 reply, 14 years ago)
since in reality you don't get to choose who your MP is, only which party your MP belongs to.
(, Tue 13 Sep 2011, 21:27, Reply)
You vote for an individual at local level, not a party. When did you last vote?
(, Tue 13 Sep 2011, 21:44, Reply)
But also any constituency with a big split between several candidates delivers even less representation since the majority of people will likely cast votes for someone other than the one who goes on to "represent" them.
(, Tue 13 Sep 2011, 21:51, Reply)
Hence there is variation of views within parties- Ken Clarke is far further to the left than Osborne, for example.
(, Tue 13 Sep 2011, 21:56, Reply)
but I can't vote for Ken can I. I like the Dutch system where you can vote for either a party, or a person, or pretty much anything you like. And they have very high turnouts.
(, Tue 13 Sep 2011, 22:04, Reply)
Meh. I like PR on an intellectual level, but FPTP on a pragmatic level.
As long as there is party politics you'll always have to vote for someone who doesn't quite match your views, or stand yourself as an independent.
And that is just madness.
(, Tue 13 Sep 2011, 22:10, Reply)
than FPTP. In fact pretty much every other way is better than FPTP.
(, Tue 13 Sep 2011, 22:17, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread