About the only thing I could realistically choose to spend less on on that list is rent.
I'd have to move out to zone 4 and find an equally rough area, as the nice once cost about the same as New Cross. I'd lose some of the money I'd save paying to commute, unless I chose to ride 10-15 miles to work each day and I'd loose maybe 5 hours of my life each week commuting. all this for not a huge financial gain, maybe £100 a month if I'm lucky, hardly seems worth it.
( CQ Knows the truth, all of it., Mon 21 Nov 2011, 12:35, 1 reply, 13 years ago)

I don't have a clue about your finances and how they work....
... or for that matter, I don't really have a clue about your lifestyle. But, and this is a presumption here based on what I do know, which could be very wrong... but you don't seem to have much in the way of luxories, which is something most people (even on benfits) seem to get at least occasionally.

If you're gonna move, why not move outside of london but still _easily_ comutable? I've come to the conclusion that I can get more bang for my buck by moving to Enfield, a nice part too, and still easily get into London for work related things on a daily basis. I dont' even have to worry about last non-tube train as I can get the last tube into Southgate or Oakwood and then bus it from there.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Mon 21 Nov 2011, 12:47, Reply)

I fully admit, I'm extremely materialistic, where as you're the oppersite of that.
Gadgetry, fags and food is my 'thing', but like a balance, I don't drink and I don't spend a lot on a night out.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Mon 21 Nov 2011, 12:48, Reply)

I'll look at it, but I don't like a long commute and I do like to cycle to work
I think living in London is my luxury. Other wise you are spot on, I live simply and cheaply, only other luxury is travelling around the country meeting B3tans.
( CQ Knows the truth, all of it., Mon 21 Nov 2011, 12:52, Reply)