b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1493941 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

See I didn't give the proles an oppertunity to either talk about themselves food or have a good moan.
So I get few replies.

Shame on you!
(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:11, 3 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
I just don't know what the answer is Chompy
It seems fairer that rich people should pay more than poor people, but they always moan that it is unfair on them.
I'm rubbish at economics. Soz.
(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:14, Reply)
Well they will pay more, but the same percentage.
I think it could be sold to the population as fair and simple, but it wouldn't be sold to the massive accountancy and law firms that make millions by knowing what's going on.
(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:26, Reply)
I understand that
But someone with 25% taken off £100k is left with considerably more than someone with 25% taken off £12.5k
(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:36, Reply)
Well yes but unless it's over a 100% tax that'll always be the case

(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:42, Reply)
It is sad if the best solution to stopping the rich avoiding paying more is to make poor people poorer.
Whatever happened to philanthropy and altruism?
(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:45, Reply)
It wouldn't make poorer people poorer.
It'll give the people paid less than £12,000 a tax level of 0% which is much better than the current system.
(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:49, Reply)
I stand by my original point about being rubbish at economics
There would be an interesting knock on effect on pay though - everyone earning £12,001-15,000 would surely want their pay reducing down to £12,000?
(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:58, Reply)
nope, cos they'd only pay tax on the amount above £12000.
same as the current system
(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 14:02, Reply)
Oh yeah
Rubbish at economics, you see?
(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 14:03, Reply)
Is that with brown sauce or ketchup?

(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:14, Reply)
if its meat, brown sauce
if its chips, ketchup

This broadcast was brought to you by the Quinten Oftiweak Party for Common Sense
(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:30, Reply)
Why are you now Quinten and not Quentin?

(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:31, Reply)
i kept spelling my name wrong when trying to log in

(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:31, Reply)
Right

(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:33, Reply)
LIES.
Brown sauce is proletarian and therefore inferior.
(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:42, Reply)
bacon and sausage are also proletarian
you wouldn't have brown sauce or ketchup on your roast duck would you?
(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:43, Reply)
an interesting point.
But I'm afraid bacon and sausage are the class bridges that hold us together in these troubled times.
(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:45, Reply)
don't be afraid

(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:47, Reply)
I'm always slightly afraid, Quenters.

(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:51, Reply)
i'm here for you
there, there
(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 14:03, Reply)
My answer willl just get me hounded for unrealistic lefty pretensions, so I'm staying shtum.

(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:32, Reply)
What he said^
Only with more shooting of rich bastards
(, Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:49, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1