I was reading in the paper today about this women on facebook who made profiles of boys and used them to mollest "underage girls".
On reading the article, she was 19, it happened 3 - 4 years ago, and the girls they mentioned were 13-14 at the time. That makes her 15-16 at the time mollesting a 13-14 year old. Ok, it's still wrong, but they worded like she was a dangerous peadofile. The language they used to refer to her was "women" and to the girls she molested as 'girls'. I got quite angry at that.... Sure, she's done wrong, she's been done for fraud, but what she did wasn't on par of the conaultation of "peadofile" in my book.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 20:20, 1 reply, 14 years ago)

This confuses me.
Why didn't she just go for lesbians? I know there are gay men who have a thing for straight men but she seems totally fucked up.
( girlinthehole, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 20:22, Reply)

I guess maybe possibly at that age, there wasn't as many about? As in, there aren't as many that have come out? I donno.

( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 20:27, Reply)