
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Or not that I can find. I'd rather give £5 a month to development of stable fusion power than to stop stray dogs being put down.
( , Thu 3 May 2012, 16:31, 3 replies, latest was 13 years ago)

i'm sorry, i know the hopes of mankind rest on its shoulders, but it's a purple goose
( , Thu 3 May 2012, 16:34, Reply)

( , Thu 3 May 2012, 16:35, Reply)

( , Thu 3 May 2012, 16:36, Reply)

well it made fusion, it wasn't a net gain.
( , Thu 3 May 2012, 16:38, Reply)

( , Thu 3 May 2012, 16:41, Reply)

www.theregister.co.uk/2012/03/23/nif_laser_pulse/
( , Thu 3 May 2012, 16:54, Reply)

i think i read the wikipedia page on it and they said funding had been cancelled, wikipedia lied ot me again
( , Thu 3 May 2012, 16:57, Reply)

I'm surprised no one's facilitated that. Maybe you should?
( , Thu 3 May 2012, 16:35, Reply)

not worth doing if you're only going to get a tenner a month. And you wouldn't know which project would be considered "cool"
( , Thu 3 May 2012, 16:49, Reply)

uses interest to process payments quality control running costs etc
then does a big donations once every quarter or something to the research projects required.
Would be pointless unless a lot of people use it though, obviously.
( , Thu 3 May 2012, 16:52, Reply)

I actually think it's quite a good idea, just probably unmanageable under current charity regs.
*not in practice, obviously, but in concept.
( , Thu 3 May 2012, 16:55, Reply)

because of the tax changes and wouldn't mind putting that towards something but most charities leave me cold.
Strange that the model has only been used for health based research before.
( , Thu 3 May 2012, 16:59, Reply)

Gates foundation, Quatar foundation etc all support other research. I think. We're playing around with them over some of our blood stuff but fuck you have to jump through some hoops.
( , Thu 3 May 2012, 17:01, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread