But rather than spending our money on a whole new venue
Couldn't we have spent less money on improving it and attracted a cash investment from visitors?
( The Disappointed Caravanner of the year, Fri 18 May 2012, 20:01, 1 reply, 14 years ago)

as a londoner it's costing me more than you

( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Fri 18 May 2012, 20:04, Reply)

But you're getting out of it a better transport and facilities infrastructure than we are.

( The Disappointed Caravanner of the year, Fri 18 May 2012, 20:07, Reply)

I'm not Iive in the west...4

( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Fri 18 May 2012, 20:09, Reply)

Isn't a lot of the "legacy" going into Crossrail though?

( The Disappointed Caravanner of the year, Fri 18 May 2012, 20:12, Reply)

cross rail was always an option
what we really need is a new airport in the thames estuary, that would be good
( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Fri 18 May 2012, 20:13, Reply)

London City?

( The Disappointed Caravanner of the year, Fri 18 May 2012, 20:17, Reply)

needs MOAR size

( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Fri 18 May 2012, 20:23, Reply)

It's called Schipol.
Short of some Panama Canal type excavation, that's the best you'll get.
( The Disappointed Caravanner of the year, Fri 18 May 2012, 20:31, Reply)

I haven't seen much improvement.
And I've been in and around East London where the games are going to be - Clapton, Shoreditch, Hackney, Mile End, Bethnel Green etc - loads the past month or so. I honestly wouldn't know there'd been improvements unless someone told me. That said the new Kings Cross and London Bridge concourses are nice. Don't make a difference to the actual travelling, mind.
(Barry from Eastenders is, despite the words written above, not a woman, Fri 18 May 2012, 20:09, Reply)