well,
if he's representative of the current Police force, then I for one might start committing more crimes.
On a more serious note, there was an article in the paper the other day about how a lot of the problems stem from the lawyers being to smart, and there being too many ways to get off on a technicality, so although a man is guilty, and very obviously so, just becuase a copper didn't change his shirt between checking different evidence samples it gets thrown out*

obviously this is an exaggeration, but you get my point.
( Windy Pig I'm naturally quite suspicious about the moon., Thu 11 Oct 2012, 10:53, 1 reply, 13 years ago)

Very much this
that is why more and more laws keep getting brought in, classic example using a mobile while driving. Driving without due care and attention already covered it, but too many arrogant twats with expensive lawyers weaseled out of it, so we got a new law.
(localboy purveyor of pisspoor puns, Thu 11 Oct 2012, 11:09, Reply)

I know it is a lawyers job to try and defend their client,
but when there is such a raft of evidence, there must be a way to get the buggers in jail.
( Windy Pig I'm naturally quite suspicious about the moon., Thu 11 Oct 2012, 11:11, Reply)