I think over the kind of distance they'd have fired it, it would be perfectly accurate enough...

( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Fri 26 Oct 2012, 12:35, 2 replies, latest was 12 years ago)

I like to think a freakishly big super soldier shot it from the hip into that guys face

( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Fri 26 Oct 2012, 12:36, Reply)

actually that's probably bollocks, come to think of it. It'd be more affected by wind over short distances.
Perhaps they're just complete cunts?
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Fri 26 Oct 2012, 12:36, Reply)

They'd already marked the landing zone.
So they would have locked the mortar in place. Shot one round, then dragged him to where it landed then shot another round.
(PsychoChomp, Fri 26 Oct 2012, 12:37, Reply)

But the wind chompy, what about the wind?

(Bazongaloid, Fri 26 Oct 2012, 12:40, Reply)

Not that big an effect.

(PsychoChomp, Fri 26 Oct 2012, 12:41, Reply)

You would have to be a complete cunt to execute some one with a mortar,
So the idea that it takes a couple of attempts probably doesn't bother them.

Perhaps they just strapped the round to his back and threw rocks at him.
( Bartleby A dead man on vacation, Fri 26 Oct 2012, 12:43, Reply)

I imagine mortars in north korea are just tubes that fire clothes irons, nails, old plates and a raggedy leather boot

( glued eel /questions/questionsyoudliketoask/post1648081, Fri 26 Oct 2012, 12:45, Reply)

Hush your mouth. Tha'ts their top secret nuclear deterant.

( Bartleby A dead man on vacation, Fri 26 Oct 2012, 12:49, Reply)