b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1799436 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Right, so that would be OK?
But knowing every single thing about all forms of science, which by definition would allow me to duplicate the pill I had just taken isn't OK? Typical fucking "soft" subject bias. No wonder this country's gone to shit, Chompy.
(, Tue 4 Dec 2012, 12:27, 2 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
but languages change a lot slower than science, you'd be out of date within 6 months.

(, Tue 4 Dec 2012, 12:28, Reply)
wouldn't matter.
I'd have the recipe for a pill to get back up to date, wouldn't I?
(, Tue 4 Dec 2012, 12:29, Reply)
and duplicating a pill that's already been metabolised is going to be a tough one even for you "so called" scientists.

(, Tue 4 Dec 2012, 12:30, Reply)
don't need to worry about that.
It was made by some form of science, I now know everything about science, so therefore I could re-create it.
(, Tue 4 Dec 2012, 12:31, Reply)
What if they didn't record the method correctly.
Only had a vague equipment list, WHAT IF IT WASNT A PEER REVIEWED TECHNIQUE
(, Tue 4 Dec 2012, 12:37, Reply)
I didn't ask for access to all scientific journals
I asked for knowledge of everything in science. Even if they did it in a secret cave, never wrote it down, and killed themselves after posting it to me so the secret can never be known, it's science that happened before I took the pill. So I know it.
(, Tue 4 Dec 2012, 12:39, Reply)
Well what if it was made by God?
And don't tell me it can't be because you just pointed out that I can't prove God doesn't exist.
(, Tue 4 Dec 2012, 12:39, Reply)
I totally didn't.
I pointed out that when you proved God doesn't exist, you still wouldn't convince religious people of it. It's a genius one-way tenant, the religious are allowed to point out the flaws in scientific arguments but the opposite is not allowed as "it's beyond human understanding"
(, Tue 4 Dec 2012, 12:41, Reply)
But wouldn't that drive you to madness? Knowing so much stuff?

(, Tue 4 Dec 2012, 13:13, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1