
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

It's not like they need to slap a layer of Dulux on it. It's a complex job that will need to be done carefully and painstakingly by experts.
Maybe Cecilia Gimenez is free?
( , Thu 13 Dec 2012, 15:05, 1 reply, 12 years ago)

It still doesn't really cost that to restore a fucking painting. I could reproduce that picture perfectly on a grain of sand using a femtosecond laser and an atomic force microscope and it'd still cost about a tenth of that.
( , Thu 13 Dec 2012, 15:15, Reply)

(NB I am being serious, could you really do that? If yes you have SKILLZ)
( , Thu 13 Dec 2012, 15:17, Reply)

Although, these days I'd probably have to get one of my postdocs to do it, I'm well out of practice at anything other than politics and arguing with funding bodies.
My group usually uses femtosecond lasers for etching internal microchannels in glass blocks and my AFM is set up for cell imaging rather than this kind of guff. But it's perfectly doable.
( , Thu 13 Dec 2012, 15:20, Reply)

( , Thu 13 Dec 2012, 15:22, Reply)

All your data is fucked, usually. Mine's set up in an acoustic isolation housing on an air table and even then closing a door 30 feet away buggers it.
( , Thu 13 Dec 2012, 15:23, Reply)

Like that guy who invented gravity when the apple fell on his head.
( , Thu 13 Dec 2012, 15:27, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread