b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1811344 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

The term champagne socialist annoys me
it is possible to earn a lot of money and still want better conditions for the majority of people and pay your fair share towards that. That's the whole point of Socialism rather than Communism.

The fact that he earns a lot of money doesn't make him a cunt.

The fact that he is a cunt makes him a cunt.
(, Tue 18 Dec 2012, 12:24, 4 replies, latest was 13 years ago)
and yet, lots of people believe that if someone has had a "privilaged" upbringing
then they can't seriously care about "poorer people"
(, Tue 18 Dec 2012, 12:28, Reply)
i thought champagne socialist referred to those born in money, who had never worked, that became socialist pushers?

(, Tue 18 Dec 2012, 12:31, Reply)
I don't know, but even if it did, so what?
What is the problem with people lucky enough to be born with means trying to put those means to good use?
(, Tue 18 Dec 2012, 12:32, Reply)
no, I'm with you Al,
It is a bullshit phrase.
(, Tue 18 Dec 2012, 12:34, Reply)
agreeing with Al here
If he was earning that much and avoiding paying tax on it, then that would be hypocrisy regarding his socialism. One guy I know claims to be an 'anarcho-socialist'(I know) yet objects to paying tax. He also thinks that pension companies rip off 'the poor' in spite of the fact that you need disposable income to invest in a private pension, so are unlikely to be on the breadline.

He's a bit of a nob.
(, Tue 18 Dec 2012, 12:33, Reply)
Hey, CQ's alright!

(, Tue 18 Dec 2012, 13:20, Reply)
Yup.

(, Tue 18 Dec 2012, 12:42, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1