Off Topic
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Oh, there's consistency alright.
Be somebody a modwhosenameIwon'tmentionbecausepeopletendtodisappear doesn't like and get heavy-handed treatment.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:09, 1 reply, 12 years ago)
Be somebody a modwhosenameIwon'tmentionbecausepeopletendtodisappear doesn't like and get heavy-handed treatment.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:09, 1 reply, 12 years ago)
To be fair to Scaryduck,
Battered did spend a couple of weeks following him around the internet accusing him of being an alcoholic nonce.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:15, Reply)
Battered did spend a couple of weeks following him around the internet accusing him of being an alcoholic nonce.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:15, Reply)
I was under the impression that infant children were time-consuming
I MEAN BATTERED'S KID
HE'S OBVIOUSLY GOT TOO MUCH TIME ON HIS HANDS
DON'T STEP ME I'M REALLY FUCKING BORED
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:19, Reply)
I MEAN BATTERED'S KID
HE'S OBVIOUSLY GOT TOO MUCH TIME ON HIS HANDS
DON'T STEP ME I'M REALLY FUCKING BORED
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:19, Reply)
Yeah, god knows taking the piss and bullying is definitely frowned on here.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:29, Reply)
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:29, Reply)
That's a pretty good reason to not like him.
Not a very good reason to use your mod powers to punish him because you don't like him.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:37, Reply)
Not a very good reason to use your mod powers to punish him because you don't like him.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:37, Reply)
Yeah I can't argue with that
Well I could, but not honestly, and this really isn't the sort of place where argumentative dishonesty is encouraged.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:38, Reply)
Well I could, but not honestly, and this really isn't the sort of place where argumentative dishonesty is encouraged.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:38, Reply)
It's the age old problem of being identified as a troublemaker.
The naughty kid at school always received harsher treatment than everyone else.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:39, Reply)
The naughty kid at school always received harsher treatment than everyone else.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:39, Reply)
It's that age old problem of being a mouthy little shit
and then saying "what me, what did I do?" and trying to look innocent when you get stepped after basically yelling PLEASE STEP ME!!!!
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:51, Reply)
and then saying "what me, what did I do?" and trying to look innocent when you get stepped after basically yelling PLEASE STEP ME!!!!
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:51, Reply)
The difference being is that he didn't do that this time.
Which is what makes it unreasonable.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:53, Reply)
Which is what makes it unreasonable.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:53, Reply)
The reason he was given was 'repeated, deliberate trolling across boards with multiple accounts. Last warning'.
Now I can see that they might not like him posting this in three places on the site.
But is this really 'deliberate trolling'?
No one appears to be upset by it.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:55, Reply)
Now I can see that they might not like him posting this in three places on the site.
But is this really 'deliberate trolling'?
No one appears to be upset by it.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:55, Reply)
At a stretch, it's trolling the mods
but yeah, they're pushing the definition to victimise him. IMHO.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:57, Reply)
but yeah, they're pushing the definition to victimise him. IMHO.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:57, Reply)
I'm not even sure putting one post on three sub boards is even spamming
particularly as on /talk he just linked to this post. I certainly wouldn't call it "repeated trolling".
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:59, Reply)
particularly as on /talk he just linked to this post. I certainly wouldn't call it "repeated trolling".
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:59, Reply)
I still reckon his crime is impersonating a mod
Well, that and being a cunt.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:01, Reply)
Well, that and being a cunt.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:01, Reply)
*sigh*
he even said in his own post he'd be stepped, he knew the risks and even seems to have expected the result. seems he was right.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:58, Reply)
he even said in his own post he'd be stepped, he knew the risks and even seems to have expected the result. seems he was right.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:58, Reply)
Yes but was this particular post step-worthy?
Or was he anticipating he'd be stepped because the mods have got it in for him?
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:01, Reply)
Or was he anticipating he'd be stepped because the mods have got it in for him?
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:01, Reply)
yeah, and they have it in for him for no reason at all?
you ask for it hard enough for long enough you get it.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:04, Reply)
you ask for it hard enough for long enough you get it.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:04, Reply)
No, one guy has it in for him for pretty specific reasons.
Nobody is saying that they aren't legitimate. What we are saying is that he has been modded for a post that isn't offensive, purely because he has been offensive to this particular mod in the past.
Regardless of his past behaviour, mods mod on a post by post basis, or they're supposed to.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:05, Reply)
Nobody is saying that they aren't legitimate. What we are saying is that he has been modded for a post that isn't offensive, purely because he has been offensive to this particular mod in the past.
Regardless of his past behaviour, mods mod on a post by post basis, or they're supposed to.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:05, Reply)
He wasn't attacking scaryduck in this post.
He wasn't behaving badly in this post. He wasn't fucking asking for anything.
Disproportionate response.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:11, Reply)
He wasn't behaving badly in this post. He wasn't fucking asking for anything.
Disproportionate response.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:11, Reply)
if I agree with battered will you start asking for him to be banned?
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:19, Reply)
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:19, Reply)
I see your point, don't get me wrong
The question is whether or not this post was really worth a stepping. It's obviously his own fault that these things are watched closely.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:06, Reply)
The question is whether or not this post was really worth a stepping. It's obviously his own fault that these things are watched closely.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:06, Reply)
I'm not saying that Battered is not a cunt.
But I don't think this was really a stepping offence.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:53, Reply)
But I don't think this was really a stepping offence.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 10:53, Reply)
their site, their rules
since when did it have to make sense or be logical. it was predictable enough.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:05, Reply)
since when did it have to make sense or be logical. it was predictable enough.
( , Thu 3 Jan 2013, 11:05, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread