You've obviously got a clear understanding here.

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Wed 23 Jan 2013, 12:11, 1 reply, 12 years ago)

To many loop holes to be exploited Tangles

( hartley hare Just some prick who thinks it doesn't apply to him, Wed 23 Jan 2013, 12:15, Reply)

There's no real loop hole.
It's "you can't try someone or send someone to be tried on evidence which you get through torture"
The british government has spent years saying "ohhh goooo on, they'll promise not to"
(PsychoChomp, Wed 23 Jan 2013, 12:18, Reply)

Or you’re a nasty piece of work that we know is involved with terrorism.
Rather than fuck about in a long legal battle that the tax payer will foot the bill for, we will just extradite you back to your own country.
And don't go crying to the Europe appeals court we don't recognise them
( hartley hare Just some prick who thinks it doesn't apply to him, Wed 23 Jan 2013, 12:32, Reply)

www.b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post1839198
( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Wed 23 Jan 2013, 12:33, Reply)

We don't "know" he's involved in terrorism enough to charge him with an offense in the UK.

(PsychoChomp, Wed 23 Jan 2013, 12:33, Reply)

Knowing and proving are two different things

( hartley hare Just some prick who thinks it doesn't apply to him, Wed 23 Jan 2013, 12:34, Reply)

Oh shut up.
Your basic argument is, "I know better than some of the most qualified judges in the world, they must be wrong." Which is bollocks.
(PsychoChomp, Wed 23 Jan 2013, 12:46, Reply)

Or why spend loads of tax payers money delaying the obvious

( hartley hare Just some prick who thinks it doesn't apply to him, Wed 23 Jan 2013, 12:47, Reply)