b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1912520 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I guess that depends on your boss.

(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:23, 1 reply, 12 years ago)
But I'm asking you, as a mod, why it's different.

(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:24, Reply)
Because Chompy was caught looking at naked men and a flawlessly shopped cock by his boss.

(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:26, Reply)
But isn't he going out with someone who takes their clothes off for money?
Surely he's a bit more open minded about this kind of thing?
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:27, Reply)
I'll be honest here, I'm just pulling Chompy's name out the hat because he..
...threw a wobbler after his boss caught him looking at a Beth Ditto image that JMG posted on here. It probably wasn't him, it could have been any one of the regulars who've been posting on here all day and voting it onto the PP.
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:28, Reply)
ha ha!

(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:30, Reply)
Well, personally, I don't have a boss, so it shouldn't matter to me.
but if someone posted a picture of a woman in a bikini on /OT during work hours, and someone else complained, then I would link it, yes.

Just think about TV watersheds. If they wouldn't put it on BBC during the day, don't post it on /OT.

Then again, I'm just going by what it's been like during the last few years. If it's time to change the format, and the majority wants pictures of naked Chegwins and that, then they're welcome to it, and those of us that don't like it can fuck off to somewhere else.
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:29, Reply)
But they do put pictures of women in bikinis on before the watershed, on holiday programmes and such.
Would Badger's picture have been acceptable if the blokes were wearing thongs?
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:31, Reply)
I don't know.
Maybe I'm the one in the wrong. Maybe that's what /OT should really be about, and I should fuck off to mumsnet.

"Am I being unreasonable to ask people not to post CDCs during office hours?"
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:36, Reply)
This entire site was founded on CDCs, and the entire point of the CDC is to circumvent NSFWery.
Perhaps I should have that Baby's First Banhammer off you.
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:38, Reply)

b3ta.com/board/10940028

Just saying, here.
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:44, Reply)
And 1 out of the 4 posters who replied asked you to link it.
I have a feeling I'm on to a loser with this one, so I'll admit defeat.
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:47, Reply)
Windy Pig wasn't being serious though, that's the thing with the mods, they don't actually know anything about the stuff they're meant to mod.

(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:49, Reply)
yeah,
i actually was joking there, but that candle thing is a far cry from a picture of actual nearly naked men, that i really don't want on my screen at work.
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 22:03, Reply)
You're OK with the child porn, though, right?

(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 22:10, Reply)
I suspect that request had more to do withe size of the image than the content.

(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:50, Reply)
it was a joke on the response you would expect from the /board perverts.

(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 22:03, Reply)
hey b3th why don't you just stick to your guns for once.

(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:50, Reply)
There's not much point tonight, is there?

(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:51, Reply)
I think you should edit all the ab posts about this to the pictures baldmonkey posted of his wedding.

(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:53, Reply)
That might be just the tiniest bit petty.

(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:54, Reply)
it would make me laugh.

(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:56, Reply)
The were all deleted due to CDC's :(

(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:54, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1