 Off Topic
 Off TopicAre you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
 well yer, there has to be some 'steerage' on where they're going. But if George wholesale refused to follow their lead there'd bee a lot more leaks on what a fucking prick he is
	well yer, there has to be some 'steerage' on where they're going. But if George wholesale refused to follow their lead there'd bee a lot more leaks on what a fucking prick he is(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 9:52, 3 replies, latest was 13 years ago)
 I'd just like to leak that you are a fucking WOMAD Kershaw yurt prick.
	I'd just like to leak that you are a fucking WOMAD Kershaw yurt prick.(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 9:55, Reply)
 Essentially the treasury have to do what they are told
	Essentially the treasury have to do what they are toldso, Osborne and his team say what they want. The treasury tell them it's idiotic. They ask for it anyway, and the treasury have to work out a way to do it.
Most chancellors defer to the treasury on most things, except key pre-election promises, but obviously the treasury are geared up for that, as in the run-up to elections they work out how the key policies of all the parties would work, just in case they get elected.
Osborne defers on very little, but the treasury's hands are essentially tied. Ultimate decision rests with the chancellor, which is why having a chancellor who is both an economic idiot and unspeakably arrogant is a really, really, fucking bad idea. The fact he's Tory is really neither here nor there, this is apolitical. It's the fact he's George Osborne that is the major problem.
(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 9:58, Reply)
 yeah, but he runs a very successful family business. he's got a proven track record, he's not just a career prick in the treasury
	yeah, but he runs a very successful family business. he's got a proven track record, he's not just a career prick in the treasury(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 10:03, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

