The fact that it's a charity.
That should be their motivation.

Like when slebs do charity things for free. I'm not suggesting they shouldn't be paid, but they should be doing it for less than the market rate because they want to help the charity.

Of course this will never happen, as people are scum.
( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 13:08, 1 reply, 11 years ago)

well of course
I can't see an additional rate taxpayer opting to take a 30k drop in salary just because it's a charity.
(dozers, do fuck off ur a nob m8, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 13:09, Reply)

No, you can't. Neither can I.
Still - one can dream.

Who mentioned 30k?
( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 13:11, Reply)

Dozer did, in the post above yours

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 13:13, Reply)

I plucked the figure from the ether.
So what reduction in salary do you think there should be in the charity sector then?
(dozers, do fuck off ur a nob m8, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 13:21, Reply)

I dint actually mention a reduction in salary.
But rather that I was aware that larger charities operate far more like profit-making companies than what might be perceived as making money for charity.

CEO bonuses and expensive "research trips" abroad withstanding.
( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 13:29, Reply)