b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 2215317 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Amateur.

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:30, 1 reply, 11 years ago)
If I go up a waistband, it'll mean my waist measurement will be larger than my inside leg
and I'm pretty sure that's the point where you're officially fat.
(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:32, Reply)
not really.
depends on your build, dunnit?
(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:33, Reply)
No.
If your waistband is larger than your inside leg, you're fat.
(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:35, Reply)
I can think of quite a few professional sportsmen who would argue that.

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:36, Reply)
They would be wrong.
The stupid, fat cunts.
(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:38, Reply)
Man, I'd pay money to watch you say that to James Haskell or James Thompson.

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:43, Reply)
They'd be pissed off, but I'd be able to outrun them
on account of not being a useless lump of lard.
(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:46, Reply)
Haskell can run 60 m in less than 7 seconds. Good luck there, chief.

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:48, Reply)
Then, by simple logic, I must be capable of doing it in less than 5
since I'm not dragging all that fat around.
(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:51, Reply)
Very muscular guys like them usually have quite small waists.
I know a guy who is 19 stone and has a 28 inch waist.
(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:47, Reply)
Those two don't. They aren't fat.

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:48, Reply)
Exactly, so their waist band might be smaller than their inside leg. Especially Haskel, he's like 8 foot tall

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:50, Reply)
Yeah they are.

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:51, Reply)
Darts players?

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:38, Reply)
wasn't there a study recently that said you're ok so long as your waist is less than half your height?

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:40, Reply)
Depends on your build.

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:44, Reply)
So I'm fine but you're fucked?

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:48, Reply)
pfffffft

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:48, Reply)
I can't see how
I'm pretty sure you're supposed to be longer than you are wide.
(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:37, Reply)
^^voice of reason

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:38, Reply)
unless you have about a 200" waist
you're going to be longer that you are wide, tangles.
(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:45, Reply)
he doesn't even have a 200mm waist
never mind anything below it
(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:48, Reply)
Tangles is 16.6' tall?????

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:49, Reply)
only when he stands next to battered

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 10:49, Reply)
Your waist is measured around. It's more or less a circumference.
So, someone with at 200" waist is about 68" inches wide. Or 5'8"
(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 12:07, Reply)
And fat.

(, Mon 17 Feb 2014, 12:08, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1