Well, it's not simple. It never is, is it?
I might be going to this gig with his ex-girfriend, who I love very much.
We're seeing each other casusually. Well, seeing isn't the right word. Whenever he can be arsed he'll come and see me and fuck me. When he doesn't want to fuck me he doesn't speak to me. His reason for coming up to the gig in Manc (other end of the country from where he's at uni) was to fuck me. I dunno, maybe I can just be like, hey it's just like old times!
And I met him through this band too.

But I dunno.

That's good to hear :) It's great you can count on internet love and friendship; being told you're worthwhile is brilliant. Keep your chin up.
( Lampito rise with the moon, go to bed with the sun, Wed 3 Jun 2009, 14:32, 1 reply, 16 years ago)

Ah right.
Yes, the whole 'just sex' thing has to work on both sides; it's often fraught with problems.
( thealternativefact, Wed 3 Jun 2009, 14:38, Reply)

It's a foolish idea
where one party (and lets face it, it's the man 99% of the time) gets to have sex whenever he feels like it without actually needing to bother with the whole caring about someone else part.

It's a very bad situation and if he's not going to stop it, you have to. For your own sake.

/serious answer
(Bazongaloid, Wed 3 Jun 2009, 14:44, Reply)

Fuckbuddies bad idea
either the sex gets shit or the buddies part gets shit.
( fuck shit up the best you never had, Wed 3 Jun 2009, 14:45, Reply)

I have a higher sex drive than him.
And I'm the one pushing to be friends. He'd just rather I was a vagina and didn't talk, than actually see me as a human being.

I wonder why I keep in contact with him. Spose I just am weak-willed, and he's been part of my life for so long.

But thanks for the serious answer. In return, I will say, you are right, not only for the reasons listed but that I'm sure I could find someone better in bed.

(Sorry, darling)
( Lampito rise with the moon, go to bed with the sun, Wed 3 Jun 2009, 14:50, Reply)

*Worries*

( whenanimalsattackhumans clad in global hypercolour, Wed 3 Jun 2009, 15:03, Reply)