Both, I think
And then I realised I was making two mistakes.

1. I wasn't speaking to a maths geek.
2. He was married.
( jim_bob can herd cats., Tue 30 Jun 2009, 12:23, 2 replies, latest was 17 years ago)

Could you please explain it to me?
Or will that infuriate you?
( Roota zweeeeeoooooowm, Tue 30 Jun 2009, 12:24, Reply)

Maths geek tries to apply maths to romance.
Fails.
( jim_bob can herd cats., Tue 30 Jun 2009, 12:25, Reply)

: (

( Roota zweeeeeoooooowm, Tue 30 Jun 2009, 12:38, Reply)

I'm not sure why 1. or 2. are important
You don't have to be a maths geek to recognise algebraic equations nor to be unmarried to realise that "love" can be difficult to understand.

:edit: Errrr, you've changed the url.
( Captain V, Tue 30 Jun 2009, 12:27, Reply)

Perhaps the problem lay in the explanation
I tried the simple one I gave to roota.

Still a blank.

Either the man has a heart of stone or just truly doesn't understand geeks.

In a way, I kind of pity the fact he'll never laugh at a raptor joke.
( jim_bob can herd cats., Tue 30 Jun 2009, 12:32, Reply)

I'm sure he understood that
But probably didn't find it very funny. I'd describe that particular comic as interesting rather than funny.
( Captain V, Tue 30 Jun 2009, 12:37, Reply)